🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive policy to ban social platforms access for young people below 16 is sending ripples worldwide. Officials, safety advocates, and guardians are observing intently to see if this approach will become a template for the rest of the world.

European Trend

Across Europe, a increasing chorus of states are moving toward parallel restrictions.

• Denmark has announced a ban on social media for under-15s, with the prime minister declaring that mobile devices and networks are "robbing our youngsters' youth". The policy may be enacted next year.
• Norway is preparing to enforce a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard young people from the "power of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is introducing a digital wallet to verify the user details of social media users. The media minister have stated that an Australia-style ban could be "one of the options under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has urged lawmakers to enact a bill lifting the legal age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a similar move, including an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has recommended guardians to block their children from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has adopted a non-binding motion supporting a ban for under-16s except if a parent decides otherwise is granted. Although it highlights of the "habit-forming" nature of these apps, the move does not create enforceable legislation.

"A strong age limit is a solid foundation," said a leading European lawmaker behind the measure.

Britain: An Evidence-Based Approach

In the UK, the government has kept open a possible ban, emphasizing that "no measure is discarded" but maintaining any policy must be "grounded in conclusive data".

Previously, momentum grew behind a bill to introduce limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately watered down. However, the administration committed to further research the issue.

Charities have expressed concerns. An organization established by the relatives of a teenager who took her own life after viewing disturbing online content contends that a simple age ban could fail to make platforms safer and could create a "dangerous transition" of harm when users reach the legal age.

"This ban is a answer to the refusal of the tech sector to design tools that are appropriate and age appropriate for young users," stated a prominent online safety campaigner.

The United States: A Fragmented Picture

In the United States, action is mostly happening at the regional level due to federal stalemate.

• Utah demands parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and restricts overnight use.
• The state of Florida has signed a bill prohibiting under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has enacted a regulation restricting teenagers to one hour of social media access per day, with additional use needing parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise enacted laws mandating guardian approval for minors to open social media presences.

Despite cross-party agreement and proposals from certain politicians to follow this path, a US-wide ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Outlook

Beyond the West, further states are similarly considering moves.

• Malaysia aims to restrict social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the minimum age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, world organizations take a more nuanced stance. Unicef has cautioned that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "might have unintended consequences". The organization highlights that online platforms can be a "vital connection" for marginalized youth and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to prioritize user protection.

While this international discussion unfolds, the policies of this nation and several other countries show that states globally are increasingly content to delay for the industry to act voluntarily.